Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> Yeah, I was quite proud of that accent. I\u2019ve always done accents and I have kind of have very distant Scottish relatives —\u00a0not enough that they were in my life that I could be exposed to the accent, but growing up in South Africa, you know, we were exposed to a lot of British influence, you know, English variations and derivatives. And so I love all the dialects of that area. And choosing the accent is usually the first and most important part for me of a character, because to me so much comes through in accent. So I knew that I wanted him to be Scottish, I knew this [was] probably going to be sort of old world English-type accents and I was, \u201cI want Scottish\u201d as the king. And in my screen tests I did Scottish because I knew, for example, there\u2019s something very interesting about that accent, where it works equally well playing the common man as it does a regal. There\u2019s a sound in the Scottish accent of real royalty and majesty, where you know the guy from South London wouldn\u2019t sound as good as the king, you know what I mean? It doesn\u2019t translate as well. But somehow the Scottish common man sounds okay in the same version of the dialect. So that\u2019s a reason why I chose that accent in that case.<\/p>\n Question: In the film there\u2019s a younger version of the character, Stefan, who appears as a boy. Do you get to sit down with the other actor?<\/strong><\/p>\n Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> No, you don\u2019t. Or in this case I did not. And they actually had somebody else, and I think both for Angie and I for some reason at some point they switched (actors), so I did meet a guy who I thought was playing the younger me … Well, no, I met the guy who was playing the 15 or 16-year-old me, so no, no, I didn\u2019t get to. But it is interesting. I saw a South African TV series the other day called “Shaka Zulu,” and what was very interesting was they played the 16-year-old version of the character but they used the voice of the man, which made sense. It suddenly was like I totally believe that\u2019s the same guy because of his voice. So it was like he was 18 or something where he wasn\u2019t too young, you know, you couldn\u2019t do the 12-year-old voice, how can I do the 12-year-old voice myself? But I could probably do the younger voice of myself, which I think would actually help audiences buy a transition like that more. And they never seem to do that in films, they always use the voice of the young actor, but it sort of blew my mind, it was like this old TV show done in South Africa in the 1980s, and I was like, \u201cWow, that actually works surprisingly well if you do it properly.\u201d<\/p>\n Question: How was it working with Angelina Jolie?<\/strong><\/p>\n Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> I just sort of was like, let’s\u00a0leave the whole most famous woman in the world thing at the door and then let\u2019s just do this. I took that chance and thankfully that\u2019s what she wanted from me I suppose. And she was just very grounded and sort of very respectful and just treated me, you know, surprisingly in some ways perhaps to some people or from the outside, just sort of as an equal, you know, which … I wouldn\u2019t have expected that, I wouldn\u2019t have required it. I really, really enjoyed the process of working with her. She\u2019s one of the actresses I admire most. Very specifically what I admire is there\u2019s very few actresses who are known and loved as movie stars who would take a role, for example, where they\u2019re going to say, \u201cI hate you\u201d to a baby, and know that they can do that and still have the audience root for them. You know, it\u2019s a certain type of actor that has that range in knowing fans love [them] as the hero the whole time. It\u2019s difficult for people once they become movie stars to do that —\u00a0even if they have the acting chops to do it, the audience won\u2019t accept it from them if they try sometimes. So, umm, I think what she had sort of seen and commented on in “District 9” was my sort of layers of being able to mess with [layers of sympathy] as one watches the character, you know, and playing with that —\u00a0is this guy good, is he bad? He\u2019s complex. And so I think we gravitated to wanting to work together because I could feel that with her and thought this is gonna be a very interesting film because I\u2019m going through this almost the reverse of what I went through in “District 9,” starting nice and just deteriorating. She\u2019s starting nice, going bad and then coming back, and that I thought would be very interesting, energetically, to\u00a0sort of provide a kind of energetic chemistry for the audience, which I think it kind of still does.<\/p>\n Question: Regarding “District 9,” which you brought up —\u00a0I remember talking to you upon its release, and you weren’t totally sure you wanted to be an actor. You\u2019re still doing it and doing it well, so I guess you are an actor now.<\/strong><\/p>\n Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> I guess so, yeah. I\u2019m going back soon, I hope, into behind-the-scenes. And I\u2019m writing a lot, you know, so I\u2019ll probably be directing something that I write within the next couple of years. I\u2019m really looking forward to doing that as well.<\/p>\n Question: But you\u2019re in Neil Blomkamp’s next film — you\u2019re a robot in “Chappie,” is that right?<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong> Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> Yes, yes, a childlike robot which is also great. He only gets to about 9 years old in his emotional development, so I got to run around in one of the most dangerous cities in the world being a child, it was awesome. Sort of the reverse of London, where I ran around like a crazy evil maniac in one of the safest cities, and then ran around like an innocent babe in one of the most dangerous. Welcome to acting, ladies and gentlemen.<\/p>\n Question: What was the dangerous city?<\/strong><\/p>\n Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> Oh, well, “Chappie” was shooting in Johannesberg, and for me, you know, because it\u2019s where I grew up and I\u2019m playing a light character, that was fun. And working with Neil was very rewarding the third time out, it was very easy for us.<\/p>\n Question: What can you say about that relationship?<\/strong><\/p>\n Sharlto Copley:<\/strong> I think we\u2019re finding our stride now on this third film, you know, and going back to smallest-dollar filmmaking. I\u2019m doing the lead again, which I haven\u2019t really done since “District 9,” so this was something that I really felt would be fun.\u00a0And I\u00a0could trust Neil completely to make sure that the animation of what I\u2019m doing was on point. I mean, the part that\u2019s blowing my mind is the animating over my movements, and … they\u2019re using absolutely everything that I do in sort of poor man\u2019s motion-capture style. I was never sure how this would translate, but the amount of me that is in the character is incredible. Like, I can see in a little sequence if there\u2019s like a half a second where there\u2019s a stunt guy that was doing a part of a sequence, I can tell that that\u2019s the stunt guy in watching the animation. I can tell you tracing over the stunt guy because he moves slightly differently from me, and if you use a performance so movement-based, the audience won\u2019t see it but I see it. And it\u2019s quite amazing because you\u2019ve created something totally different now. Now you literally [only have] to focus the behavior, the essence of this being —\u00a0you’re not at all concerned about the appearance which you normally would be heavily concerned about as an actor.<\/p>\n Question:\u00a0When a\u00a0project comes your way, what is the first thing you look for? It seems like you\u2019re doing a lot of bigger-than-life science-fiction or fantasy.<\/strong><\/p>\n Sharlto Copley: <\/strong>You know, I can’t really say. It\u2019s sort of an instinctive thing. I will usually just have an instinctive reaction, and then sometimes think about pros and cons and whatever afterwards. But I\u2019m always trying to see if I can play something that is based on truth that metaphorically is sort of a characterized story version of something that exists in reality. So Stefan, everything he does to me … is drawn from ways that human beings behave — ways that, you know, ambitious men behave. From my point of view, Stefan loved [Maleficent] the whole way, you know. This is his true love who he betrays for power, he chooses that. It\u2019s like the equivalent of the man who chooses work over his family. And that man usually doesn\u2019t do it in one moment, where it\u2019s like, “Listen, if you sacrifice your true love, you can be the chairman of the board and make a hundred million dollars.” You know, he\u2019s gonna say no there. But he\u2019s gonna gradually do it because he\u2019s spending more time at work, he then gets to a certain level of success, he trades his wife in as she gets older for the younger version, he\u2019s never there with his kids. It\u2019s like Stefan\u2019s doing all of that — he\u2019s living with his guilty conscience of having betrayed the one person that he truly loved, you know, and anybody who\u2019s in any way betrayed somebody that they really truly loved, lives with their conscience. They maybe don\u2019t drive themselves crazy as Stephan does, but they live with that pain.<\/p>\n
![\"Sharlto](\"http:\/\/www.shockya.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/Sharlto-Copley.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"