In a recent Twitter exchange, renowned author Stephen King and tech magnate Elon Musk found themselves at odds over the potential legal fate of former President Donald Trump. King had taken to the social media platform to express his belief that Trump might eventually face jail time, stating, “I’ve started to believe that Donald Trump may really go to jail. God knows he deserves to.” This remark caught the attention of Musk, who swiftly responded with a poignant statement highlighting the importance of equal application of the law.

Musk’s reply to King’s tweet was direct and concise: “Almost everyone would agree that no one is above the law, but it must be applied equally.” In those few words, Musk emphasized the fundamental principle that justice should be impartial and should not favor any individual, regardless of their status or position. This response sparked further debate and discussion among social media users who were divided in their opinions.

Expanding on his stance, Musk shed light on the risks associated with a differential pursuit of justice. He argued that when the law is not applied equally, it undermines public trust in the system and exacerbates divisions within society. By advocating for fairness and impartiality, Musk’s comments resonated with many individuals who believe in the importance of a justice system that treats everyone equally.

It is worth noting that Stephen King had previously shared his thoughts on Donald Trump’s downfall in a retweet of a meme posted by actor Kevin Sorbo. King attributed Trump’s demise to his own arrogance and narcissism, suggesting that President Joe Biden had no role in it. These prior remarks indicate King’s perspective on Trump’s accountability and the actions that led to his current situation.

The clash between Stephen King and Elon Musk over the potential legal fate of Donald Trump has captivated social media users, drawing attention to the ongoing debates surrounding the former president and the concept of justice in society. While King believes Trump deserves legal consequences, Musk highlights the significance of treating everyone equally under the law. This exchange of differing opinions serves as a reflection of the polarizing discussions that continue to shape public opinion.

By Alki David

Alki David — Publisher, Media Architect, SIN Network Creator - live, direct-to-public communication, media infrastructure, accountability journalism, and independent distribution. Born in Lagos, Nigeria; educated in the United Kingdom and Switzerland; attended the Royal College of Art. Early internet broadcaster — participated in real-time public coverage during the 1997 Mars landing era using experimental online transmission from Beverly Hills. Founder of FilmOn, one of the earliest global internet television networks offering live and on-demand broadcasting outside legacy gatekeepers. Publisher of SHOCKYA — reporting since 2010 on systemic corruption inside the entertainment business and its expansion into law, finance, and regulation. Creator of the SIN Network (ShockYA Integrated Network), a federated media and civic-information infrastructure spanning investigative journalism, live TV, documentary, and court-record reporting. Lived and worked for over 40 years inside global media hubs including Malibu, Beverly Hills, London, Hong Kong and Gstaad. Early encounter with Julian Assange during the first Hologram USA operations proved a formative turning point — exposing the realities of lawfare, information suppression, and concentrated media power. Principal complainant and driving force behind what court filings describe as the largest consolidated media–legal accountability action on record, now before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. Relocated to Antigua & Barbuda and entered sustained legal, civic, and informational confrontation over media power, safeguarding, and accountability at Commonwealth scale.