REAL TALK

FINANCIAL NEWS POLITICS

CFPB and DOJ Issue Warning to Banks: Providing Loans to Illegal Aliens Mandatory, Warns the Biden Administration

ByAlki David

Oct 20, 2023

In a recent joint statement, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have sent shockwaves through the financial sector by warning banks against denying credit lines and loans to illegal aliens. This directive comes as part of the Biden administration’s efforts to ensure fair treatment and equal access to financial opportunities, regardless of immigration status.

The CFPB emphatically reminded financial institutions of their obligation under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prevent discrimination based on national origin, race, and other protected characteristics. The joint statement stressed that credit applicants are shielded from bias, irrespective of their immigration status.

According to the CFPB, instances have been reported where individuals with strong credit histories and ties to the United States were denied credit cards, as well as auto, student, personal, and equipment loans solely based on their immigration status. The statement underscored the importance of fair access to credit, describing it as a cornerstone for building wealth and fortifying household financial stability.

CFPB Director Rohit Chopra affirmed the bureau’s commitment to combating illegal discrimination, asserting, “Fair access to credit is crucially important for building wealth and strengthening household financial stability. The CFPB will not allow companies to use immigration status as an excuse for illegal discrimination.”

The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division Assistant Attorney General, Kristen Clarke, echoed this sentiment, cautioning banks about potential violations of federal law if they refuse loans to illegal aliens. She emphasized that lenders must not impede individuals from pursuing their financial goals based on biased considerations unrelated to their ability to repay.

“Lenders should not deny people the opportunity to take out a loan to buy a home, build their businesses, or otherwise pursue their financial goals because of unlawful bias and without regard to their actual ability to repay,” warned Kristen Clarke. “This guidance reminds lenders that denying someone access to credit based solely on their actual or perceived immigrant status may violate federal law.”

This move by the Biden administration has sparked debates about the intersection of immigration policy and financial regulations, raising questions about the government’s role in ensuring equal economic opportunities for all residents.

By Alki David

Alki David — Publisher, Media Architect, SIN Network Creator - live, direct-to-public communication, media infrastructure, accountability journalism, and independent distribution. Born in Lagos, Nigeria; educated in the United Kingdom and Switzerland; attended the Royal College of Art. Early internet broadcaster — participated in real-time public coverage during the 1997 Mars landing era using experimental online transmission from Beverly Hills. Founder of FilmOn, one of the earliest global internet television networks offering live and on-demand broadcasting outside legacy gatekeepers. Publisher of SHOCKYA — reporting since 2010 on systemic corruption inside the entertainment business and its expansion into law, finance, and regulation. Creator of the SIN Network (ShockYA Integrated Network), a federated media and civic-information infrastructure spanning investigative journalism, live TV, documentary, and court-record reporting. Lived and worked for over 40 years inside global media hubs including Malibu, Beverly Hills, London, Hong Kong and Gstaad. Early encounter with Julian Assange during the first Hologram USA operations proved a formative turning point — exposing the realities of lawfare, information suppression, and concentrated media power. Principal complainant and driving force behind what court filings describe as the largest consolidated media–legal accountability action on record, now before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. Relocated to Antigua & Barbuda and entered sustained legal, civic, and informational confrontation over media power, safeguarding, and accountability at Commonwealth scale.