President Joe Biden at the U.S. Department of State in Washington, D.C., on February 4, 2021. [State Department Photo by Freddie Everett/ Public Domain]

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the Second Amendment community, President Joe Biden announced that he will be banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. This announcement came on the heels of the Department of Justice (DOJ)’s announcement that it would be allocating $231 million to states to be used for crisis intervention.

The President’s decision has been met with both praise and criticism. Gun control advocates have applauded Biden’s commitment to tackling the issue of gun violence, while gun rights advocates have criticized the move as an infringement on their constitutional rights.

The ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines is expected to be met with fierce resistance from gun rights advocates. However, the President has made it clear that he is committed to reducing gun violence in America.

In a statement released by the White House, Biden stated, “We cannot wait any longer to take action on gun violence. We need to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines to keep our communities safe. And we need to provide resources to states to address the root causes of gun violence.”

The DOJ’s allocation of $231 million to states for crisis intervention is part of the Biden administration’s broader plan to address gun violence. The funds will be used to support evidence-based intervention programs, which aim to prevent violence before it occurs.

The move is likely to face challenges in the courts, with gun rights advocates arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. However, the Biden administration is confident that the ban will withstand legal challenges.

The ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines is just one part of the Biden administration’s efforts to tackle gun violence. The President has also called on Congress to pass a comprehensive background check bill, as well as legislation to close loopholes that allow individuals to purchase firearms without undergoing a background check.

The President’s commitment to addressing gun violence has been lauded by gun control advocates, who argue that action is long overdue. However, gun rights advocates have vowed to fight the ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, arguing that it will do little to address the root causes of gun violence.

As the debate over gun control continues, one thing is clear: the issue of gun violence is one that requires action. Whether the ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines is the right approach remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the Biden administration is committed to addressing this critical issue.

By Alki David

Alki David — Publisher, Media Architect, SIN Network Creator - live, direct-to-public communication, media infrastructure, accountability journalism, and independent distribution. Born in Lagos, Nigeria; educated in the United Kingdom and Switzerland; attended the Royal College of Art. Early internet broadcaster — participated in real-time public coverage during the 1997 Mars landing era using experimental online transmission from Beverly Hills. Founder of FilmOn, one of the earliest global internet television networks offering live and on-demand broadcasting outside legacy gatekeepers. Publisher of SHOCKYA — reporting since 2010 on systemic corruption inside the entertainment business and its expansion into law, finance, and regulation. Creator of the SIN Network (ShockYA Integrated Network), a federated media and civic-information infrastructure spanning investigative journalism, live TV, documentary, and court-record reporting. Lived and worked for over 40 years inside global media hubs including Malibu, Beverly Hills, London, Hong Kong and Gstaad. Early encounter with Julian Assange during the first Hologram USA operations proved a formative turning point — exposing the realities of lawfare, information suppression, and concentrated media power. Principal complainant and driving force behind what court filings describe as the largest consolidated media–legal accountability action on record, now before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. Relocated to Antigua & Barbuda and entered sustained legal, civic, and informational confrontation over media power, safeguarding, and accountability at Commonwealth scale.