REAL TALK

NEWS POLITICS

Who Really Owned the White House Cocaine? Biden Administration’s Controversial Response Raises Eyebrows

ByAlki David

Jul 7, 2023
White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates

Experts were left scratching their heads as the Biden administration invoked the Hatch Act in response to inquiries regarding the ownership of the cocaine discovered at the White House. This peculiar turn of events has only deepened the mystery surrounding the recent July snowstorm that swept through the White House, and the administration remains tight-lipped on whether President Biden or his son, Hunter Biden, had any connection to the scandal.

During a press gaggle on Thursday, White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates was confronted with the question of whether the president or his son can deny ownership of the cocaine found at the White House, an accusation initially made by former President Donald Trump. However, instead of providing a direct response, Bates strategically invoked the Hatch Act, a piece of legislation that restricts federal employees from engaging in campaign activities or discussing certain topics using federal resources.

Bates cleverly sidestepped the question by stating, “I don’t have a response to that because we have to be careful about the Hatch Act.” This non-response only fueled speculation and left many wondering why such an unusual law was being evoked in relation to a question about illegal substances at the White House. The public’s frustration with the lack of transparency from the administration has been growing, and it seems to stem from a stark contrast between their policy records and the controversies that have engulfed them.

It is important to note that the Hatch Act was not designed to address matters of potential drug possession at the highest level of government. Rather, its purpose is to ensure that federal employees do not utilize their positions for personal political gain or engage in campaign-related activities. By employing this legislation as a shield, the Biden administration effectively redirected attention away from the issue at hand and towards the perceived frustration of their political opponents.

The speculation surrounding the ownership of the cocaine found at the White House continues to dominate headlines, with no clear answers in sight. While the Biden administration may find solace in invoking the Hatch Act to deflect inquiries, the public’s demand for transparency and accountability remains steadfast. The American people deserve to know the truth about this peculiar incident and whether it has any implications for the integrity and reputation of the presidency.

In conclusion, the Biden administration’s evasive response to questions about the ownership of the cocaine discovered at the White House raises more questions than it answers. By invoking the Hatch Act, they effectively avoided addressing the issue directly, leaving experts and the public alike baffled. As the mystery surrounding this event lingers, it is imperative that the administration recognizes the public’s right to know the truth and provides a clear and transparent account of the situation.

By Alki David

Alki David — Publisher, Media Architect, SIN Network Creator - live, direct-to-public communication, media infrastructure, accountability journalism, and independent distribution. Born in Lagos, Nigeria; educated in the United Kingdom and Switzerland; attended the Royal College of Art. Early internet broadcaster — participated in real-time public coverage during the 1997 Mars landing era using experimental online transmission from Beverly Hills. Founder of FilmOn, one of the earliest global internet television networks offering live and on-demand broadcasting outside legacy gatekeepers. Publisher of SHOCKYA — reporting since 2010 on systemic corruption inside the entertainment business and its expansion into law, finance, and regulation. Creator of the SIN Network (ShockYA Integrated Network), a federated media and civic-information infrastructure spanning investigative journalism, live TV, documentary, and court-record reporting. Lived and worked for over 40 years inside global media hubs including Malibu, Beverly Hills, London, Hong Kong and Gstaad. Early encounter with Julian Assange during the first Hologram USA operations proved a formative turning point — exposing the realities of lawfare, information suppression, and concentrated media power. Principal complainant and driving force behind what court filings describe as the largest consolidated media–legal accountability action on record, now before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. Relocated to Antigua & Barbuda and entered sustained legal, civic, and informational confrontation over media power, safeguarding, and accountability at Commonwealth scale.