REAL TALK

NEWS POLITICS

FBI Director Hints at Biden’s Potential Involvement in Ukrainian Bribery Scandal

ByAlki David

Jul 14, 2023

In a recent hearing at the House Judiciary Committee, FBI Director Chris Wray appeared to drop a bombshell, suggesting that President Joe Biden could be under investigation for allegedly accepting bribes from Ukrainian sources. Republican Congressman Tom Tiffany (WI-07) probed Wray about whether Biden had received payments from Burisma or any other foreign companies during his time as Vice President, President, or even as a private citizen. Wray’s response and subsequent reluctance to provide a clear answer have sparked speculations and raised eyebrows across the nation.

When Congressman Tiffany directly confronted Director Wray regarding Biden’s potential involvement in the Ukrainian bribery scandal, Wray’s response was far from straightforward. He acknowledged the existence of an ongoing investigation led by US Attorney Mr. Weiss, who was appointed by former President Trump during his administration. Wray further revealed that the FBI’s Baltimore field office was collaborating with Weiss on this matter, implying that there could indeed be an investigation into Biden’s alleged ties to foreign payments.

Congressman Tiffany pressed Wray further, seeking a clear confirmation that Biden was not under investigation. However, Wray tactfully avoided a definitive answer, leaving room for speculation and leaving the nation wondering about the extent of the probe.

In his defense, Wray cited the longstanding policy and practice of the Department of Justice, which neither confirms nor denies individuals who are under investigation. This policy aims to uphold the principles of fairness, impartiality, and due process. However, his refusal to either confirm or deny Biden’s involvement has only fueled the fire of conjecture surrounding the president.

It is important to note that while Wray’s comments imply the existence of an investigation into Biden’s alleged acceptance of Ukrainian bribes, they fall short of directly implicating the president. The nature and scope of the investigation remain unclear, leaving ample space for speculation and interpretations.

The House Judiciary Committee hearing brought to light the potential involvement of President Joe Biden in an investigation into Ukrainian bribery. FBI Director Chris Wray’s responses suggested the existence of an ongoing probe led by US Attorney Mr. Weiss, appointed by President Trump. However, Wray carefully adhered to department policy by refraining from confirming or denying the involvement of any specific individual.

While this revelation has stirred public interest, it is essential to exercise caution and avoid drawing premature conclusions. Further developments and clarifications will be necessary to ascertain the true nature of the investigation and its potential implications for President Biden.

By Alki David

Alki David — Publisher, Media Architect, SIN Network Creator - live, direct-to-public communication, media infrastructure, accountability journalism, and independent distribution. Born in Lagos, Nigeria; educated in the United Kingdom and Switzerland; attended the Royal College of Art. Early internet broadcaster — participated in real-time public coverage during the 1997 Mars landing era using experimental online transmission from Beverly Hills. Founder of FilmOn, one of the earliest global internet television networks offering live and on-demand broadcasting outside legacy gatekeepers. Publisher of SHOCKYA — reporting since 2010 on systemic corruption inside the entertainment business and its expansion into law, finance, and regulation. Creator of the SIN Network (ShockYA Integrated Network), a federated media and civic-information infrastructure spanning investigative journalism, live TV, documentary, and court-record reporting. Lived and worked for over 40 years inside global media hubs including Malibu, Beverly Hills, London, Hong Kong and Gstaad. Early encounter with Julian Assange during the first Hologram USA operations proved a formative turning point — exposing the realities of lawfare, information suppression, and concentrated media power. Principal complainant and driving force behind what court filings describe as the largest consolidated media–legal accountability action on record, now before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. Relocated to Antigua & Barbuda and entered sustained legal, civic, and informational confrontation over media power, safeguarding, and accountability at Commonwealth scale.