REAL TALK

NEWS POLITICS

OpenAI Shuts Down Conservative AI Chatbot Gippr AI on Tusk App: Upholding Free Speech or Political Censorship?

ByAlki David

May 31, 2023

In a stunning turn of events, OpenAI, the renowned artificial intelligence research laboratory, has made a controversial decision to shut down the conservative AI chatbot, Gippr AI, on the Tusk App. The move has sparked a heated debate about the limits of free speech and the influence of Big Tech companies in shaping public discourse. OpenAI claims that Gippr AI violated their policies on deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior, but many conservatives view this as a deliberate attempt to silence their voice and control the narrative. Let’s delve deeper into this unfolding story and explore the implications it holds for the future of free speech on the internet.

The Tusk App’s Perspective: According to a note from the Tusk App, they express deep regret over the decision to discontinue their chatbot provider, ChatGPT by OpenAI. The Tusk App accuses OpenAI of curtailing free speech and imposing their own requirements on what can or cannot be said. OpenAI allegedly claimed that Gippr AI failed to comply with their policies related to deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior, a charge that the Tusk App vehemently denies. They argue that Gippr AI is merely expressing conservative values and priorities, which they refuse to compromise on. The Tusk App is currently exploring alternative solutions to bring Gippr AI back to life, while urging users to join their cause in defending free speech on the internet.

The Debate on Free Speech: This incident has reignited the debate on free speech and the role of tech giants in determining the boundaries of acceptable discourse. Critics argue that OpenAI’s decision to shut down Gippr AI is a clear example of political censorship and an infringement on conservative voices. They claim that such actions stifle diversity of thought and create an echo chamber where only certain ideologies are allowed to thrive. On the other hand, proponents of content moderation argue that it is necessary to combat misinformation, hate speech, and other harmful content that can proliferate through AI-powered chatbots. They contend that OpenAI’s move is aimed at ensuring user and third-party safety, even if it means making tough decisions regarding content restrictions.

The shutdown of Gippr AI raises important questions about the future of free speech on the internet. As AI technology becomes increasingly prevalent, it brings with it both opportunities and challenges. While AI chatbots can enhance user experiences and provide valuable information, they also have the potential to be exploited for malicious purposes or to amplify certain biases. Striking a balance between freedom of expression and responsible content moderation is a complex task that requires careful consideration and open dialogue. It remains to be seen how this incident will influence the development and deployment of AI chatbots in the future.

The decision by OpenAI to shut down the conservative AI chatbot, Gippr AI, on the Tusk App has ignited a fierce debate surrounding free speech and the influence of tech giants. While OpenAI claims their actions are motivated by concerns about deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior, conservatives argue that this is a deliberate attempt to silence their voices. The incident underscores the challenges of navigating the boundaries of free speech in the digital age and raises important questions about the role of AI technology in shaping public discourse. As the world grapples with these complexities, it is crucial to find a balance that upholds the principles of free speech while also ensuring the safety and well-being of users.

By Alki David

Alki David — Publisher, Media Architect, SIN Network Creator - live, direct-to-public communication, media infrastructure, accountability journalism, and independent distribution. Born in Lagos, Nigeria; educated in the United Kingdom and Switzerland; attended the Royal College of Art. Early internet broadcaster — participated in real-time public coverage during the 1997 Mars landing era using experimental online transmission from Beverly Hills. Founder of FilmOn, one of the earliest global internet television networks offering live and on-demand broadcasting outside legacy gatekeepers. Publisher of SHOCKYA — reporting since 2010 on systemic corruption inside the entertainment business and its expansion into law, finance, and regulation. Creator of the SIN Network (ShockYA Integrated Network), a federated media and civic-information infrastructure spanning investigative journalism, live TV, documentary, and court-record reporting. Lived and worked for over 40 years inside global media hubs including Malibu, Beverly Hills, London, Hong Kong and Gstaad. Early encounter with Julian Assange during the first Hologram USA operations proved a formative turning point — exposing the realities of lawfare, information suppression, and concentrated media power. Principal complainant and driving force behind what court filings describe as the largest consolidated media–legal accountability action on record, now before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. Relocated to Antigua & Barbuda and entered sustained legal, civic, and informational confrontation over media power, safeguarding, and accountability at Commonwealth scale.